Ukrainian tennis player at Wimbledon refused to answer questions in Ukrainian.

The first racket of Ukraine among juniors, Mykyta Bilozertsev, after losing in the first round of doubles at Wimbledon, refused to answer questions in Ukrainian. This was reported by 'Hlavkom' citing BTU.

Today, at the junior tournament, Bilozertsev and his partner, Austrian Tilo Berman, were soundly defeated by the Dutch tandem of Mis Rottgering/Gidde Schoonmakers - 1:6, 2:6.

After the match, Ukrainian journalists accredited at the tournament from the publications 'Champion' and 'Big Tennis of Ukraine' invited the tennis player for an interview. Bilozertsev came along with his coach Stefan Pantov from Bulgaria, who stated that his pupil would only answer questions in English or Russian.

Likes on posts supporting the occupiers

As reported, the sixth-ranked world player, Russian Mira Andreeva, liked posts about the activities of the pro-Putin organization 'People's Front,' which assists the occupiers.

Mira Andreeva liked posts by multi-Time medalist of the Russian championships in skiing, Anton Endzhievsky.

Anton Endzhievsky is an activist of the 'People's Front' organization, which is under sanctions from the EU, Canada, Switzerland, and Ukraine due to its support for the war. In particular, he published photos on his Instagram about how he sent assistance to Russian occupiers.

Mykyta Bilozertsev refused to answer questions in Ukrainian after losing in the tournament, while Mira Andreeva liked posts about helping Russian occupiers on social media. These behavioral traits of the athletes provoke discussion and criticism from the public and the media, highlighting their positions on geopolitical issues.

After losing in the tournament, Ukrainian tennis player Mykyta Bilozertsev refused to answer questions in Ukrainian, insisting on speaking only in English or Russian. At the same time, Russian athlete Mira Andreeva sparked widespread discussion by liking posts about supporting an organization that helps the occupiers. Both cases drew criticism and outrage among the public and the media, becoming a focus of attention in geopolitical discussions.